Comparison
Multisig
vs one signer
A single-key wallet is faster every single day and catastrophic exactly once. Here is what each model really costs a team.
Built on Safe, the most widely used multisig contracts on-chain.
One key
Everything a single signer gets wrong at once
A one-key wallet has no failure modes in between. It either works, or the entire treasury is gone in a single transaction.
Loss ends it
A lost device or a forgotten phrase is not a support ticket. The funds stay visible on-chain forever and reachable by nobody, including you.
Theft ends it
A key that leaks is a treasury already spent. There is no threshold to slow it down, no second party to notice, and no window in which to react.
Trust has no ceiling
Whoever holds the key can move everything — not because they will, but because nothing in the system prevents it. That is a burden on them as much as a risk to you.
In practice
Multisig without the friction it is famous for
The delay people associate with multisig comes from coordination, not from the contract.
- 1
Most people never sign
Requesters and approvers work in an ordinary web interface. Only signers open a wallet, and only for transactions that have already cleared approval.
- 2
Signers see what they sign
Amount, recipient and the approval history sit beside the signature prompt, so signing is a decision rather than a confirmation reflex.
- 3
The threshold is yours to set
2-of-3 for a small team, 3-of-5 for a larger one. The right number is the one that still works when a single person is unreachable.
- 4
Waiting is visible
The Safe queue shows exactly which signatures a transaction is still missing and whose they are, so a stalled payout always has a name attached to it.
Side by side
Where each model wins
Single-signer wallets are genuinely better at some things. None of them are the things a company treasury is judged on.
| What changes | Single-signer wallet | M-of-N Safe |
|---|---|---|
| Sending a payment | One signature, a matter of seconds | M signatures, minutes to hours |
| If a key is stolen | The treasury is gone | One owner is replaced; the funds stay put |
| If a key is lost | Everything becomes unreachable | The remaining owners carry on |
| Who is accountable | 'The wallet' — attributable to nobody | Each signature belongs to a named person |
| Someone leaves | New wallet, migrate every asset | Swap one owner address |
| Cost per transaction | The gas for one plain transfer | Higher — contract execution plus signatures |
Rows one and six are real costs, paid on every transaction. They are the price of the other four rows, and for a shared treasury that price is a small one.
Questions about multisig
Is multisig slower?
Yes, by design — it takes more than one person. Batching a payout run into a single Safe transaction is what stops that being felt on every payday.
What threshold should we choose?
One that tolerates a single absence. 2-of-3 is the usual floor, and 1-of-N is a single-signer wallet with extra steps in front of it.
Is gas meaningfully more expensive?
It is higher: a Safe is a contract, and contract execution costs more than a plain transfer. At treasury-sized amounts that difference is not the deciding factor.
Can we start single and move later?
Yes, and the move is one transfer. Deploy the Safe with the owners you want, then send the assets across once.
Move your team's money
transparently, starting today
Start free without a credit card. Setup takes five minutes, and your funds stay inside your team's Safe.